IN THE NEWS
Earlier, I posted several reasons why torture doesn't work. Today's Slate has an excellent article about the major legal reason why torture is a bad, bad idea: if we torture a suspect, whatever evidence we extract from him--evidence needed to convict him--will be inadmissable.
The war against al Qaeda isn't "a war like no other" until we've tried the normal means first. After 9/11, the Bush Administration went immediately to extraordinary means, from the PATRIOT Act to the special access program (SAP) that sanctioned "rough" interrogation. Apparently our collective memory didn't extend to the 1990s, when the normal trial courts convicted the group that bombed the World Trade Center in 1993, including Sheik Omar Abdel-Ramen and Ramzi Yousef. Rather than being impotent and obsolete, normal police and judicial procedures did the job. Somehow, a very large number of people forgot that happy conclusion.
The very real risk now is that the sanctioned torture of "high value" suspects threatens greater harm than has been done already. Assuming interrogators did get the proverbial "smoking gun" from someone in Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo Bay, how could this evidence lead to a conviction? Only if the US government decides to bend and break the law even further.
I think it's time for everyone to step back from the heated discussion of the day and ask the following question:
How many terrorist attacks has the United States government thwarted since 9/11, and how many attacks did it prevent in the four years prior to 9/11??
By now, the electorate should be demanding an answer to this question--particularly in an election year. Somewhere in the files must be at least one example that, if the White House decided to release the information, would walk us through the ways in which traditional and post-9/11 procedures helped prevent bloodshed. We should also be able to look at aggregate data, like the number of suspects arrested, the number of convictions made, or the number of planned attacks stopped.
"Trust us" isn't just unconvincing--it's against the democratic spirit. An election year is the appropriate time to take stock of our real, measurable progress against terrorist groups.
If the White House can't provide this information, or if the measures of progress turn out to be worse after 9/11 than before, than Phillip Carter's argument in Slate is dead on the mark: the Bush Administration has done more to undermine counterterrorism than strengthen it.
Right now my gun collection right now is mostly just Eastern Block Military peices. I love them all, and have lots of fun shooting them, however none of them are terribly valuable. I do have a few slightly more valuable peices such as a Browning Challenger III, a Ruger GP100, and a Ruger P89, and a Remington 870 Express Magnum 12 Gauge. I'd like to add a few more collectable and valuable guns to my collection, but I'd like some suggestions.
Posted by: cheap kamagra | 04/26/2010 at 08:35
ight now my gun collection right now is mostly just Eastern Block Military peices. I love them all, and have lots of fun shooting them, however none of them are terribly valuable.
Posted by: asics shose | 07/29/2010 at 02:09
I tend to agree with the comments here about the general disapproval about the monument. I live in the DC area and enjoy walks along the monument area. My biggest problem with the WWII monument is that the monument seems to glorifyNike SB Dunk High the war over the service members who lost their lives. The other war memorials in the area (WWI, Korea and Vietnam) place the emphasis on those who fell (either by name or pictures) while the WWII monument places the glory on the battles and campaigns.SB Dunk The only nod to fallen service members is in the form of a field of stars which, if people were not told what they meant, would pass with little attention being paid to it.Jordan Rereo 1
Posted by: Nike SB | 11/09/2010 at 19:10
air jordan retro 1 including Sheik Omar Abdel-Ramen and Ramzi Yousef. Rather than being impotent and obsolete, normal police and judicial procedures did the job. Somehow, a very large number of people forgot that happy conclusion retro jordans 1-23 .
Posted by: jordans shoes basketball | 12/09/2010 at 22:01
Hello friend, I am very much happy to see your blog. But the problem is I can't understand the language. Thanks for posting. All the best.
Posted by: authentic jordans shoes | 12/18/2010 at 01:27
rmtなどがそうだ。rmt リネージュ2これらMMORPGといわれるオンラインゲームは、リネージュ2 rmt1つのサーバーに数千人のプレイヤーが同時にログインしゲームを行なっている。ここでいうサーバーとは、物理的なサーバーではない。MMORPGでは、rmt とはサーバーやワールドと呼ばれる単位で複数の同じ世界が存在する。アトランティカ RMT3万人が同時に1つのサーバへアクセスすると処理が重くなってしまうrmt aion
Posted by: ff14rmt | 12/29/2010 at 00:28
They should be all be put to jail. Good hear some good news.
Posted by: new jersey dui law | 03/21/2011 at 00:30