The technical level

THEORY
The last--and lowest--level of strategy is the technical level. As its name implies, this level is all about technology--weapons, communications, transportation, and the like.

Needless to say, technology has been important in every period of warfare. Greek fire gave the Byzantines a key naval advantage. In the American Civil War, the railroads, telegraph communications, and ironclad warships helped tip the balance in favor of the Union. In World War II, cryptography gave the Allies the power to eavesdrop on German and Japanese communications.

You can come up with dozens of examples of how technology re-shaped warfare, and at the same time, how military concerns drove innovation. A generation of physicists--Einstein, Heisenberg, Fermi, Oppenheimer, etc.--not only re-wrote the rules of modern warfare, but also transformed the international system, and even US presidential politics. The first A-bombs begat H-bombs, bombers begat intercontinental missiles, ICBMS begat submarine-launched missiles, missile-armed submarines inspired new ways to detect and kill submarines...The list of innovations goes on.

The technical level is so easy to explain, and the examples so handy, that it seems like belaboring the point to describe it at all. The first step into military affairs you took probably had some connection to the technical level. Some WWII history buffs become experts in the relative merits of German, Soviet, British, Italian, Japanese, and American tanks. Some of us, as children and adolescents, built models of military aircraft, warships, or tanks. Many of us got drawn into the interesting discussions during the first Gulf War about Patriot missiles, M1A1 tanks, satellite imagery, and other pieces of equipment in the impressive US arsenal.

All good reasons why I made this level the last one to discuss. By working our way down the hierarchy of strategy--grand strategic, theater, operational, tactical, technical--we can see how easily we can overvalue the technical level. Every soldier wants the best weapon available. Unfortunately, not even the best rifle, tank, fighter, or submarine can save the day if the other levels of strategy aren't working.

PRACTICE
Going back to my last post, I'll belabor another point. Yes, the United States has superbly-trained troops, armed with some of the best military hardware in the world. (The same compliment should be extended to our coalition partners, too.) However, we're in the thick of a crisis where the best troops with the best equipment can't deliver victory.

On the electronic battlefield, GPS and other technologies give a commander the exact position of every soldier in his unit. That's an extraordinary achievement, something every commander from Themistocles to Zhukov would have wanted, if it had been available. But are these soldiers in the right places, doing the right things? As I've argued in earlier posts, there are serious defects in every level of strategy above the technical and the tactical, in both the war in Iraq and the war against al Qaeda. (Again, these are two separate wars. Even if Iraq had been the wellspring of international terrorism, you don't fight Iraqi insurgents the same way you stop the terrorist threat.) If the strategies at these levels aren't working, it doesn't matter how well trained a soldier is, or how impressive is the equipment he carries.

We've also been maneuvered--or more tragically, maneuvered ourselves--into a position where our tactical and technical edge is severely blunted. In the first Gulf War, US tanks outranged their Iraqi counterparts. In an average armored combat, the Iraqis didn't even get a chance to fire a shot before their tedchnically superior enemies knocked them out. In the current war, not only is the battlefield empty of enemy tanks, but armor is worse than useless in counterinsurgency warfare. An M1A1 tank can give "force protection" to infantry under fire, but it can't win "hearts and minds" by blowing up apartment buildings.

Anyone could have made the previous observation without understanding the levels of strategy. Therefore, I hope this discussion made two contributions, above and beyond what common sense could have supplied: (1) you can now see the technological side of warfare in a new (and slightly dimmer) light; and (2) this discussion has illuminated more clearly what else needs to be fixed before our technical and tactical strengths can be put to good use.

Comments

[generic propecia]

where is submarine and flying forttress bomber plane in battlefield 1942?

[coach sale]

Those who truly treasure the past will not bemoan the passing of the good old days, because days enshrined in memory are never lost.

[asics shose]

where is submarine and flying forttress bomber plane in battlefield 1942?

[Air Jordan Retro Shoes]

Those who truly treasure the past will not bemoan the passing of the good old days, because days enshrined in memory are never lost.

[Nike Dunk Low]

So Great! I need some infos in this post for my rapport de stage. Can i have your contact please? I need your permission to quote it . Air Jordan 6 Rings Anyway, That’s great job. Keep going.I've always had a fondness for Nazi aesthetics, myself. Of all the things to come out of Nazism, they pretty much top the list. Air Jordan Retro ShoesThat doesn't mean that our WW2 memorial should appropriate the Nazi concept- and there's no question that part of the idea is to whitewash our war effort-but I can think of a lot of monuments that are less pleasing to the eye. Nike SB Dunk High

[newest air jordans]

In the third, I think that Wesley Clark’s recent analysis of how America defeated the Soviet Union is on the mark, newest air jordans and that we will have to continue to push the contradictions on the various parties that are still entranced by the Marxist fallacies. nike jordan 1 This requires engagement with Russia and the former Warsaw pact nations to keep Russia on track and to try to minimize backsliding in parts of the old SU. basketball nike shoes We need to work China off against North Korea, and we will at some point need to deal with Castro and his few remaining Western friends.

[eyeshadow palettes]

good information not only from istorical side! thank you!

[jordans shoes basketball]

but armor is retro jordans 1-23 worse than useless in counterinsurgency warfare. An M1A1 tank can give "force protection" to infantry under fire, but it can't win "hearts and minds" by blowing up apartment buildingsair jordan retro 1.

[ff14rmt]

rmtなどがそうだ。rmt リネージュ2これらMMORPGといわれるオンラインゲームは、リネージュ2 rmt1つのサーバーに数千人のプレイヤーが同時にログインしゲームを行なっている。ここでいうサーバーとは、物理的なサーバーではない。MMORPGでは、rmt とはサーバーやワールドと呼ばれる単位で複数の同じ世界が存在する。アトランティカ RMT3万人が同時に1つのサーバへアクセスすると処理が重くなってしまうrmt aion

[scentsy starter kit]

Got this information recently and this one seems to have good changes.

[montana divorce]

Im stunned by this information.

[oakley frogskins]

Ought to be short and concise while hitting the major issues of proportional response a la "Arms and Influence." See here for an interesting discussion.