Why war?

THEORY
The thuddingly obvious place to start is Clausewitz's famous aphorism, War is the continuation of politics by other means. Or, as it has been sometimes translated, War is the use of force to compel our opponent to do our will.

Either way, Clausewitz is saying something simple and obvious: Military actions are judged by their political outcomes. Simple and obvious points get lost in the proverbial heat of battle, however, which is why people cite Clausewitz as often as they do.

As someone with first-hand experience of the Napoleonic Wars, Carl von Clausewitz spoke with a substantial authority on this point. Napoleon may have been the greatest general of his age, but in the end, the Napoleonic Wars were a failure. Certainly, they came close to establishing the French Imperium as the dominant power in Europe. But the Imperium collapsed, from the puppet states in Italy and elsewhere to the whole imperial regime in Paris. Napoleon's own decisions to take action against his opponents, from Spain to Russia, often undermined his own aims. Was Russia a threat to France? Maybe so, but at the same time, one could argue, military action against Russia was ill-conceived, and certainly the results were catastrophic.

In short, Napoleon was a great general, but a lousy statesman....Which in turn, calls into question his generalship. Defeating the Russian army and occupying Moscow was worse than meaningless--Napoleon's Russian campaign (like Hitler's) cost him his army and, in the long term, his empire. Military action may have been Napoleon's preferred tool, but it wasn't the tool for everything.

Napoleon isn't alone in making this mistake. Countless governments have committed the same error, believing that "doing something" with military force, taking some action against an adversary, was better than doing nothing. However, "doing something" is a question of actions, not results. Results, again, are measured in political outcomes: the survival and dominance of the French Imperium; the restoring of the Union and the end of slavery; the removal of fascist and expansionist regimes in Europe and Japan; the safety of American citizens from terrorist attack.

Another great thinker, Max Weber, made essentially the same point in his essay, Politics As a Vocation. Weber thought the unique characteristic of the state, as distinct from other types of organizations in a society, was that the state had monopoly over the legitimate use of violence. Another obvious point, maybe, but an equally profound one. States do other things, but political leaders need to be ready to use all means, including force (both police and military action), to achieve results.

Weber wrote this essay with a great deal of passion, so he has some very memorable things to say, such as this passage:

Whoever wants to engage in politics at all, and especially in politics as a vocation...lets himself in for the diabolic forces lurking in all violence. The great virtuosi of acosmic love of humanity and goodness, whether stemming from Nazareth or Assisi or from Indian royal castles, have not operated with the political means of violence. Their kingdom was 'not of this world' and yet they worked and still work in this world.

And this one:

Politics is a strong and slow boring of hard boards. It takes both passion and perspective. Certainly all historical experience confirms the truth --that man would not have attained the possible unless time and again he had reached out for the impossible. But to do that a man must be a leader, and not only a leader but a hero as well, in a very sober sense of the word. And even those who are neither leaders nor heroes must arm themselves with that steadfastness of heart which can brave even the crumbling of all hopes.

Weber was no pacifist; instead, he was arguing that politicians have a tough gautlet ahead of them, one that they need to be both passionate and clear-headed to traverse. And the ultimate rule of politics, he argues, is to use all means, including violence, to achieve results.

PRACTICE
So, what does this have to do with Iraq, Afghanistan, and the war on terror?

Quite a lot. First, and most obviously, we need to have a definition of victory--something so far we've lacked. How do we know when we've won? is perhaps the most basic question, but one that, oddly, many people never ask.

Here's a mental exercise everyone should try: Phrase in one or two sentences how to measure "wining the war on terror." Is it by reducing the number of terrorist victims each year? Killing a desired number of terrorists? Shutting down a particular number of terrorist organizations? Eliminating terrorist groups altogether?

Now, having defined the goal, ask yourself the obvious next question: Is the Bush Administration's strategy going to achieve this goal?

I don't presume to know the right answer for everyone, and I certainly don't expect everyone to agree. But perhaps our common starting point, as fellow citizens, is to try to reach some consensus on this point. Otherwise, we'll continue to talk past one another, because we're really talking about different wars.

But here's a point on which we can all agree:

Taking action, in and of itself, is not going to guarantee success.

That's not the same as arguing for inaction. (Far from it, if you know anything about me.) It is, however, making another obvious point: "Just do something!" is a flight from reality, not realism. The exhiliration of defeating the enemy on the battlefield, or watching the enemy's casualty statistics rise, isn't a guarantee of success. Napoleon learned that lesson the hard way, in the icy wastes of Russia. Hotter regions offer the opportunity to learn the same lesson in the same brutal fashion.

Comments

[Jim Gregory]

Just found your site.

Thanks for your contribution to collective wisdom. It is good to find citizens dedicated to the notion that we can all still learn together, by application of reason and discourse....rather than "the hard way".

[generic viagra]

Blood, Misery, Hunger, Disease, DEATH!!!!!!
That's the really best friends of war, hand by hand, shoulder to shoulder, it's a very sad thing to see, to live, to die for...
The soldiers never think in the kids, in the women, in the old people, they only care about ''winning'' an others cause, they there not by own means, they have no word, no will, just a puppet...
That's my personal way of think, my intention is not to offend anyone, in fact, i feel sorry for the people who had a familiar in that field, God be with you...

[Jordans 4]

everytime you hear the rolling thunder
You turn around before the lightening strikes
does it ever make you stop and wonder

[Authentic Nike Sb Dunks]

Are you buying this about the US Constitution?
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

[Nike SB Dunk]

Bravo, Kingdaddy! Very good post on Death by PowerPoint. Your essential theme that the deficiencies arise “when used as a replacement for…documents” in the military has an analogue in the investment community: When companies go public, Air Jordan Retro Shoes Basketball Sheos Sale they create a formal document for investors known as an S-1, a highly-detailed tome required and overseen by the Securities and Exchange Commission. But no investor worth his or her salt will make an investment decision based on an S-1 alone. They evaluate potential investments by viewing the principle officers of the offering company in an IPO roadshow. Yes, that roadshow is a PowerPoint presentation, but every CEO and CFO worth his or her salt knows that it is their discussion and analysis of the company that seals the deal. Would that the military could take a lesson from the high stakes world of Wall Street.

However, there are no bravos for the spate of comments on your blog from the detractors who blame PowerPoint for poor communication in the military and everywhere else in the universe.Nike Sb Dunks 2010 That is like blaming the Montblanc pen company for illegibility and illiteracy. Custom Jordan ShoesSorry, but poor presentations are due to user error, not the software.

[newest air jordans]

In the third, nike jordan retro 1 I think that Wesley Clark’s recent analysis of how America defeated the Soviet Union is on the mark,nike jordan 1 retro and that we will have to continue to push the contradictions on the various parties that are still entranced by the jordan sneakers Marxist fallacies.This requires engagement with Russia and the former Warsaw pact nations to keep Russia on track and to try to minimize backsliding in parts of the old SU. shop nike shoes We need to work China off against North Korea, air force 1 nike and we will at some point need to deal with Castro and his few remaining Western friends. nike sneakers shop

[air jordan 3]

This requires engagement with Russia and the former Warsaw pact nations to keep Russia on track and to try to minimize backsliding in parts of the old SU nike basketball shoes. shop nike shoes We need to work China off against North Koreanewest air jordans .

[authentic ugg boots adelaide]

In all likelihood,Women Timberlands the Germans could blow a Air Force

Ones hole through one or more sections of it, in which case Women

Parda shoes the French army would have Authentic Air Jordans to rush to plug these holes before the operationally nimble Wehrmacht could exploit them.

Since the Belgian gap was a hole that already existed in the Maginot Line Wide Women Shoes Kid Kicks.

[ff14rmt]

rmtなどがそうだ。rmt リネージュ2これらMMORPGといわれるオンラインゲームは、リネージュ2 rmt1つのサーバーに数千人のプレイヤーが同時にログインしゲームを行なっている。ここでいうサーバーとは、物理的なサーバーではない。MMORPGでは、rmt とはサーバーやワールドと呼ばれる単位で複数の同じ世界が存在する。アトランティカ RMT3万人が同時に1つのサーバへアクセスすると処理が重くなってしまうrmt aion

[coffee bags]

Do they really have to do this? Why won't they just get along?

[burberry outlet]

thank you for sharing with us, i really like the way you show to us, nice work , keeping it up

[True Religion Outlet]

GOOD, IT IS VERY NICE. I LIKE IT.following time I learn a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to learn.

[moncler outlet]

Now it so happened, that, in spite of Emma's resolution of never marrying, there was something in the name, in the idea, of Mr. Frank Churchill, which always interested her.

[foot massager]

She had frequently thought, -- especially since his father's marriage with Miss Taylor,—that if she were to marry, he was the very person to suit her in age, character, and condition.

[oakley outlet]

i believe that quality comes first before quantity..though it is needed to have enough numbers of words..

[Coach Outlet]

especially since his father's marriage with Miss Taylor,—..though it is needed to have enough numbers of words..

[louis vuitton]

i believe that quality comes first before quantity..though it is needed to have enough numbers of words..

[Coach Outlet Online]

An excellent and rigorous blog is mainly reflected a clear idea of its article , the article subject matter appropriate , content-rich and meaningful , and your blog will reflect these . Seeking such a good blog in today's network environment is very easy . I very much appreciate your article and look forward to more of your wonderful sharing .

[Christian Louboutin Outlet]

From your blog , I learned a lot and learned a lot of the philosophical nature of theories of knowledge . These I have a lot of help and inspiration . Thank you for your wonderful sharing, shared many significant and valuable knowledge and information .

[Coach Factory Outlet]

Good blog always received the welcome and loved . I very much enjoy your blog posts , in which you can learn a lot of meaningful knowledge and exposure to some meaningful knowledge of life . I am very grateful to your selfless sharing . I will continue to pay attention to your blog updates .

[Coach Outlet Online]

Incredible blog. I appreciate your good this blog , which you can learn a lot of meaningful information , these people have great value . Thank you for sharing .