The moral imperatives of war journalism

I've had the latest Rolling Stone article about Afghanistan on my "To Read" pile for a few days. Before I could get to it, however, I got distracted by the flurry of posts about the article.

The author, Nir Rosen, traveled with Taliban fighters to a meeting with a Taliban commander. While Rosen doesn't actually witness the Taliban fighting US, Afghan, or NATO troops, he very well could have--and in fact, set out with the intent of observing a Taliban attack, if the opportunity presented itself:

They have promised to take me to see the Taliban in action: going out on patrols, conducting attacks, adjudicating disputes and providing security against bandits and police.

Some bloggers, including Bing West, took exception with what Rosen did--loud, angry exception. And I largely agree with them.

During war, public information about the other side is critical. Citizens cannot judge the wisdom or stupidity of the war without knowing something about the adversary. Whether the reality of the enemy is better or worse than the caricature that emerges out of ignoramce, the important thing is, the caricature is wrong. It does not tell you what it's really going to take to defeat the adversary. Debates over the war then inevitably collapse into disagreements over the military actions we pursue, with practically no reference to the people who are their target, or the effect these operations have. Ultimately, this kind of one-sided discussion is not really about war at all, but some kind of fictional military engineering problem.

In fewer words, then, it's just important to recognize the importance of getting information about our adversaries. There's no question that, not only is that an important service that journalists can provide, but it's arguably their duty.

The real question, though, is how they go about that task. Interviewing a Taliban commander isn't wrong. Agreeing to accompany Taliban fighters during a mission to kill Afghan or Western soldiers is.

Instead of spilling a lot of my own words about this topic, I urge you to watch the second part of the "Under Orders, Under Fire" episode of Ethics In America. Both this series and The Constitution: A Delicate Balance were filmed in the 1980s. Prepare to be surprised by whom you'll see in these excellent discussions, what they say, and how well they say it.

After starting "Under Orders, Under Fire," you should first listen to the brief but illuminating discussion about torture in war. Then go to the second part, in which the panel wrestles with the problem of an American journalist traveling with enemy soldiers, just as Rosen did. The real kicker comes when a Marine colonel makes the rhetorical question: what happens when American soldiers are in a position to save endangered journalist?

If that doesn't paint a clear enough picture for you, watch this short video of a British journalist and British soldiers caught in a Taliban ambush. Next, imagine yourself as a journalist on the other side of this firefight. If you didn't have doubts whether you should be there...Well, you're a cold-hearted bastard, at the very least.

Bing West goes a little farther than necessary to make his point. Comparing the Taliban (whom I am not defending) to the Waffen SS just gives critics the opportunity to give less weight to the important part of his argument. You don't need "American moral lassitude" to explain one journalist who displayed faulty judgment.

I strongly recommend reading Robert Farley's analysis, which makes many excellent points that I don't need to repeat here. However, I'll make one last observation of my own. Rosen's article just isn't very good. He leaps to broad conclusions about the Taliban from encounters with a small group of them. Not only does that leave him open to the compound fallacy, but it's not impossible to imagine that some of the softer, nicer elements of Taliban life were staged for his benefit.

Even if you take everything he sees at face value, the narrative of the story is, "My wild, dangerous trip to see an ornery Taliban commander." His experience may add to our understanding of the war in Afghanistan, but it's too small for the general conclusions about the war that Rosen wants to make.

Comments

[Sven Ortmann]

Rosen was most likely more a burden than an asset for the Taleban during that time - I wouldn't attribute any advantages for the Taleban except propaganda (which is the same case as with an interview).

I have a feeling that you draw the line based on emotion, not based on help/no help.

You began rational, but then you took a turn to pretty much 'I don't like that!'

And then there's another interesting question: What if Rosen was a South African who happened to write for the magazine? Would that have changed anything? If yes - why?

[Charrua]

Interesting perspective, but the important word here seems to be "American", not "journalist". Non-American/British journalists do not seem to exist, for example, and the moral obligations of American/British journalists in wars that don't include American/British soldiers are left unclear.

[DHB]

This posting presents an interesting perspective no doubt. I believe that the war journalists do have some moral obligations.

[UGG Australia Boots]

On the other hand, everything in the UGGS Boots on sale collection runs large and stretches with each wear. For the UGGS Boots Collection (which has such items as the Ugg Classic Cardy Boots, UGG Australia Boots, and UGGS Boots on sale4) UGG 5815 recommends that you size down a full size. If you’re a half size, hold on to your hat: while UGG boots recommends sizing down a half size if you are between sizes (a size 8.5 would then get an 8)u2200wwx

[web design]

The tweeter that fails to tweet is also the tweeter that fails to gain followers and influence.

[Oakley Sunglasses UK]

Nice pic! Good light! It's very inspiring for me.

[ralph lauren outlet]

This looks absolutely perfect. All these tinny details are made with lot of background knowledge. I like it a lot. This was a useful post and I think it is rather easy to see from the other comments as well that this post is well written and useful.

[oakley frogskins]

This was a useful post and I think it is rather easy to see from the other comments as well that this post is well written and useful.

[Global UGGs]

Not only an excellent way to promote a new business, but a reliable way to increase sales. In this economy, this is definately a way to sustain your growth. Who doesn't need more clients? Give it away if you can, and keep traffic coming in!

[Dissertation]

good articles sir... your blog is very helpful... I am happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. Thanks for sharing.

Marketing Dissertation Topics

[burberry scarf sale]

This was a useful post and I think it is rather easy to see from the other comments as well that this post is well written and useful.

[Microsoft Office]

This article is GREAT it can be EXCELLENT JOB and what a great tool!

[beats by dre it]

This is all very new to me and this article really opened my eyes. Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.

[beats by dre it]

This is all very new to me and this article really opened my eyes. Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.